What’s in a name? Defining interdisciplinary learning within and outside the medical realm


  • Jessica Oudenampsen Radboudumc
  • Prof Enny Das Radboud University, centre for language studies
  • Marjolein van de Pol Radboudumc, primary and community care


Interdisciplinary learning, Interdisciplinary placement, Interprofessional education, Education models, Boundary crossing, Undergraduate education, medical


Interdisciplinary learning facilitates communication and collaboration with disciplines from outside the medical realm, as is needed in an increasingly complex healthcare system. However, the term ‘interdisciplinary learning’ is often used imprecisely and is often mistaken for interprofessional learning, resulting in terminological and educational confusion. When aware of the definition of both interdisciplinary and interprofessional learning, it is possible to strengthen the potential of both forms of learning. First, the authors propose to reach consensus on the definition of a discipline. When defining the medical discipline without making subdisciplines, it implies that interprofessional learning in healthcare is not necessarily interdisciplinary. Second, the authors elaborate on the specific learning outcomes of interdisciplinary learning. Both interdisciplinary and interprofessional learning focus on ‘boundary crossing’ as a potential key learning outcome. The boundaries crossed however are different. Interdisciplinary learning requires boundary crossing at the level of epistemics and ‘academic cultures’, more so than interprofessional learning.


Download data is not yet available.


World Health Organization. Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative Practice. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010.

Gyarmati G. The teaching of the professions: An interdisciplinary approach. Higher Education Review. 1986;18(2):33-43.

Fridahl M. Understanding boundary work through discourse theory: Inter/disciplines and interdisciplinarity. Science and Technology Studies. 2010;23:5-19.

Cuyegkeng MAC. The context and challenges of interdisciplinarity in the Philippines. Kritika Kultura. 2019;33-34:318-37.

Universal Decimal Classification: UDC MRF12. The Hague: UDC Consortium; 2018. Available from http://www.udcc.org/index.php.

Miles M, Rainbird S. Evaluating interdisciplinary collaborative learning and assessment in the creative arts and humanities. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education. 2015;14(4):409-25.

Mansilla V, Duraisingh E. Targeted assessment of students' interdisciplinary work: an empirically grounded framework proposed. The Journal of Higher Education. 2007;78:215-37.

Gonzalez-Carrasco M, Frances Ortega J, de Castro Vila R, Castaner Vivas M, San Molina J, Marti Bonmati J. The development of professional competences using the interdisciplinary project approach with university students. J Technol Sci Educ. 2016;6(2):121-34.

Newell WH. Academic disciplines and undergraduate interdisciplinary education: lessons from the School of Interdisciplinary Studies at Miami University, Ohio. Eur J Educ. 1992;27(3):211-21.

Repko AF, Szostak R, Buchberger MP. Introduction to interdisciplinary studies. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2014.

Akkerman SF, Bakker A. Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Rev Educ Res. 2011;81(2):132-169. Available at https://www.doi.org/10.3102/0034654311404435

Evans S, Scarbrough H. Supporting knowledge translation through collaborative translational research initiatives: 'bridging' versus 'blurring' boundary-spanning approaches in the UK CLAHRC initiative. Soc Sci Med. 2014;106:119-27.




How to Cite

Oudenampsen, J., Das, E., & van de Pol, M. (2022). What’s in a name? Defining interdisciplinary learning within and outside the medical realm. Research and Humanities in Medical Education, 9, 27–30. Retrieved from https://www.rhime.in/ojs/index.php/rhime/article/view/510